1
$\begingroup$

I have an ARIMA model for monthly returns of the brazilian stock market index. Then I test the residuals of the model for ARCH effects. The ACF/PACF of squared residuals show that there are no significant autocorrelations. Portmanteu and McLeod-Li tests also show that there are no heteroscedasticity. Nevertheless, Lagrange Multipler test appear to show there is heteroscedasticity for lags 1 to 8 and the plot of squared residuals itself look a little bit like there might be some volatility clustering. When I fit GARCH models (GARCH, gjrGARCH, AVGarch, TGARCH...), the ones with smallest BIC are (0,1) models, for which the beta is very close to 1 and so the conditional sd forecasts decrease very slowly. This appears to be caused by the fact that no GARCH model should be used, is that correct?

Below: the squared residuals plot, ACF and PACF of squared residuals.

Squared Residuals Plot (first), ACF (second) and PACF (third) of squared residuals

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ can you edit this with the squared residual plot shown $\endgroup$ – develarist Jun 24 at 8:41
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your reply. Edited with the squared residual plot shown. $\endgroup$ – Paul Jun 25 at 16:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.