1
$\begingroup$

How would calculating Beta using cumulative returns differ from Beta calculated with monthly returns? Is one more appropriate to use than another?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_(finance)

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

It's more appropriate the monthly returns than the cumulative one from experience. But all depends on why and for what you gonna use it ...

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It would be used for the calculation of Beta in CAPM $\endgroup$ – steicher Aug 23 '19 at 11:19
  • $\begingroup$ well for sure it's more appropriate to use Simple returns. $\endgroup$ – Gogo78 Aug 23 '19 at 13:54
  • $\begingroup$ Could you explain why that is? $\endgroup$ – steicher Aug 23 '19 at 13:58
1
$\begingroup$

If the returns of your time series are i.i.d. the Sharpe Ratios (SR) of the daily, weekly or month samples will be the same. Since the more data the better, you should take the daily one.

Nevertheless, if your time series is auto-correlated, the different sub-sampling will give you different SR, simply because

  • if your time series is negatively auto-correlated (it mean reverts), then long term sub-samples will most probably have lower volatility, ie the monthly SR will be higher than the daily one;
  • if it is positively auto-correlated (it is super-diffusive, it is quite rare), then long term sub-samples will most probably have larger volatility: the monthly SR will be smaller.

In general, you need to look at the SR at different frequencies and to have a look at your auto-correlation, just to know it. If you want to play a little bit with your data you can even apply a Fast Fourier Transform of it, to notice some seasonality effects (that would affect to SR too).

Have a look at The Statistics of Sharpe Ratios, by Andrew W. Lo for a formal approach of this (with closed form formula for some specific shapes of auto-correlations).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think this is backwards (negative auto-correlation induces lower monthly volatility, and hence higher Sharpe ratio than daily, and positive auto-correlation induces higher monthly volatility, hence lower Sharpe ratio) but in any case, the question is about beta estimation, not Sharpe ratio estimation. $\endgroup$ – Chris Taylor Aug 28 '19 at 11:56
  • $\begingroup$ you are right, sorry, I edit my answer $\endgroup$ – lehalle Aug 28 '19 at 14:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.