A single micro-price (e.g., volume weighted mid adjusted for recent trades) is simpler and can be used for pricing both our bid and our offer.

But a bid fair and an offer fair have the desirable property that they widen out automatically as the market goes from one tick wide to five ticks wide.

As an example, given a futures book of 20 @ 6.01 / 6.03 @ 50 we would have a micro-price of 6.016 (since the bid has less volume) or a bid & offer fair of 6.012 & 6.026 (again, the bid is weaker).

Which approach is better and why?

EDIT: The above example shows two choices, a single micro-price of 6.016 or a bid/offer pair of 6.012 / 6.026.

If the market widened to 10 @ 6.01 / 6.09 @ 10, the choices would be a single micro-price of 6.05 or a bid/offer pair of 6.01 / 6.09. That shows one of the main advantages of using a bid/offer pair, they widen automatically as the market you are pricing gets wider.

  • $\begingroup$ Could you please clarify "a bid fair and an offer fair have the desirable property that..." what is this "fair" value? I do not see any alternative in your question but you ask "Which approach is better", could you again clarify? $\endgroup$ – lehalle Sep 15 at 15:37
  • $\begingroup$ If you are a market maker then you are constantly quoting a bid AND an offer. I do not understand what you are asking? $\endgroup$ – roz Sep 16 at 16:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.