2
$\begingroup$

I am trying to do a simple unilateral CVA for call and put options. I found this discretised formula online: $$ CVA = \sum_{i=1}^m \frac{EE(t_{i-1})DF(t_{i-1}) + EE(t_i)DF(t_i)}{2} \left( PD(t_i) - PD(t_{i-1}) \right) $$

And I found online that $EE = \max (S - K,0)$ for a call and $EE= \max(K - S,0)$ for a put. Then, I found that $PD = N(d_2)$ for a call and that $PD = N(-d_2)$ for a put. Where N is the cumulative distribution function and d2 is from the Black-Sholes framework.

Is this way of calculating the CVA correct ?

Moreover $DF$ should be a Discounting Factor and I was thinking of using the risk-free rate used to price the options. Does it make sense? Moreover, I do not see the LGD anywhere, why?

I am looking for a basic approach involving Monte-Carlo that I could code in Python. I have not studied quantitative finance and I have not advanced Mathematical knowledge.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ My 2cents: 1) Everything should be multiplied by LGD indeed, 2) when being (long) call/puts EPE(t)DF(t) = MtM(0) assuming deterministic rates, 3) PD(t) is the probability of default of the counterparty, it has (a priori) nothing to do with the risk-neutral probability of the underlying of the option ending up ITM as you seem to indicate 4) you don't need Monte-Carlo here since everything is closed form (note that the formula can be simplified since the discounted expected positive exposure is constant) $\endgroup$ – Quantuple Oct 29 '19 at 20:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.