3
$\begingroup$

"Stochastic volatility models can be thought of as sticky delta model. And Local volatility model as sticky Strike." Please help me understand how the author has reached this conclusion.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Where is that from ? LV most certainly is not sticky strike by the commonly accepted definition of sticky strike i.e. IV(k) remains constant whatever the spot does. $\endgroup$ – Ivan Oct 13 '19 at 18:40
  • $\begingroup$ yes you are right. LV is seen close to Sticky strike. I am not able to understand this. $\endgroup$ – Ussu Oct 13 '19 at 18:47
  • $\begingroup$ gaussiandotblog.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/… $\endgroup$ – Ussu Oct 13 '19 at 18:49
  • $\begingroup$ page 395 or search "Dupire". You will be directed to stochastic and local volatility section. $\endgroup$ – Ussu Oct 13 '19 at 18:53
  • $\begingroup$ This is only true for (log-)space homogeneous SV models (e.g. Heston) and concerns the partial derivative Delta $\endgroup$ – Quantuple Oct 14 '19 at 9:59
5
$\begingroup$

Intuitively, in a (log)-space homogenous diffusion model $$ S_t \propto S_0, \forall t \geq 0 $$ such that implied volatilities will only depend on the moneyness level and not on the absolute spot level, which is precisely the definition of sticky delta.


Mathematically, consider a (log)-space homogeneous diffusion model (be it stochastic or not) $$ \frac{dS_t}{S_t} = \mu(\cdot) dt + \sigma(\cdot) dW_t,\,\,\,S(0) = S_0 $$ where by (log)-space homogeneous we mean that the drift and diffusion coefficients on the RHS do not involve $S_t$. As such:

  • a LV model is not space homogeneous since $\sigma(\cdot) = \sigma(t,S_t)$
  • a SV model à la Heston is space homogeneous since $\sigma(\cdot) = \sqrt{v_t}$ with $v_t$ given by a separate SDE.

[Homogeneity relationship] Because of (log-)space homogeneity we have that the price of a European vanilla option is a homogeneous function of degree 1 i.e. $$ C(\xi S_0, \xi K, T) = \xi C(S_0, K, T), \forall \xi > 0 $$ such that by Euler's theorem (i.e. taking the derivative of the above wrt to $\xi$ and evaluating it at $\xi = 1$) we get $$ C = \frac{\partial C}{S_0} S_0 + \frac{\partial C}{\partial K} K $$

[IV stickiness (1/2)] Consider a space homogeneous diffusion model with parameters $\Theta$. The corresponding implied volatility surface is the mapping \begin{align} \Sigma &: (S_0, K, T) \to \Sigma(S_0,K,T) \\ \text{such that } & C(S_0,K,T;\Theta) = C_{BS}(S_0, K, T; \Sigma(S_0,K,T)) \end{align} where $C_{BS}(.)$ denotes the Black-Scholes pricing formula for a European call option.

Given the model's space homogeneity, we just showed that: $$ S_0 \frac{\partial C}{\partial S_0}(S_0,K,T;\Theta) + K \frac{\partial C}{\partial K}(S_0,K,T;\Theta) = C(S_0,K,T;\Theta) $$ Plugging in the above implied volatility definition then allows one to write (chain rule) $$ S_0 \left[ \frac{\partial C_{BS}}{\partial S_0}(S_0, K, T; \Sigma) + \frac{\partial C_{BS}}{\partial \Sigma} \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial S_0}(S_0,K,T) \right] + K \left[ \frac{\partial C_{BS}}{\partial K}(S_0, K, T; \Sigma) + \frac{\partial C_{BS}}{\partial\Sigma} \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial K}(S_0,K,T) \right] = C_{BS}(S_0, K, T; \Sigma) $$

Denoting the Black-Scholes Vega by $\nu$ and noting that the Black-Scholes model is itself space homogeneous, one gets \begin{gather*} S_0 \left[ \frac{\partial C_{BS}}{\partial S_0}(S_0, K, T; \Sigma) + \nu \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial S_0}(S_0,K,T) \right] + K \left[ \frac{\partial C_{BS}}{\partial K}(S_0, K, T; \Sigma) + \nu \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial K}(S_0,K,T) \right] = C_{BS}(S_0, K, T; \Sigma) \end{gather*} Or equivalently rearranging terms: \begin{gather*} \nu \left[ S_0 \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial S_0}(S_0,K,T) + K \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial K}(S_0,K,T) \right] + \underbrace{S_0 \frac{\partial C_{BS}}{\partial S_0}(S_0, K, T; \Sigma) + K \frac{\partial C_{BS}}{\partial K}(S_0,K,T;\Sigma) - C_{BS}(S_0, K, T; \Sigma)}_{=0 \text{ (BS space homogenenity) }} = 0 \end{gather*}

such that the following relationship holds for all space homogeneous models \begin{equation} \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial S_0}(S_0,K,T) = -\frac{K}{S_0} \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial K}(S_0,K,T) \end{equation}
which is consistent with a sticky moneyness (= sticky delta) behaviour, see below.

[IV stickiness (2/2)] A sticky moneyness (= sticky delta) implied volatility surface is such that $$ \Sigma(S_0+\delta S_0, K, T) = \Sigma(S_0, K^*, T) $$ provided, as the name indicates, that we are working iso-moneyness, meaning that $$\frac{K^*}{S_0} = \frac{K}{S_0+\delta S_0} \iff K^* = K(1 + \delta S_0/S_0)^{-1}$$

Under such circumstances, \begin{align} \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial S_0}(S_0, K, T) &= \lim_{\delta S_0 \to 0} \frac{\Sigma(S_0+\delta S_0, K, T) - \Sigma(S_0, K, T)}{\delta S_0} \nonumber \\ &= \lim_{\delta S_0 \to 0} \frac{\Sigma\left(S_0, K(1 + \delta S_0/S_0)^{-1}, T\right) - \Sigma(S_0, K, T)}{\delta S_0} \nonumber \\ &= \lim_{\delta S_0 \to 0} \frac{\Sigma\left(S_0, K(1 - \delta S_0/S_0), T\right) - \Sigma(S_0, K, T)}{\delta S_0} \nonumber \\ &= \lim_{\delta K \to 0} \frac{\Sigma\left(S_0, K-\delta K, T\right) - \Sigma(S_0, K, T)}{\frac{S_0}{K}\delta K} \nonumber\\ &= -\frac{K}{S_0} \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial K}(S_0, K, T) \end{align} which is the relationship stemming from price homogeneity we found above.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much for such a detailed answer. $\endgroup$ – Ussu Oct 28 '19 at 20:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.