I got a question and its partial solution, and have some doubts about the volatility of its geometric Brownian motion process:


How would you price an exchange call option that pays $max(S_{T,1}-S_{T,2},0)$ at maturity. Assume that $S_1$ and $S_2$ are non-dividend paying stocks and both follow geometric Brownian motions with correlation $\rho$


The payoff of the exchange option depends on both $S_{T,1}, S_{T,2}$, so we need two geometric Brownian motions:

$dS_1 = \mu_1S_1dt+\sigma_1S_1dW_{t,1}$ $dS_2 = \mu_2S_2dt+\sigma_2S_2dW_{t,2}$

Yet if we use $S_1$ as the numeraire, we can convert the problem to just one geometric Brownian motion. The final payoff is $max(S_{T,1}-S_{T,2},0)=S_{T,1}max(S_{T,2}/S_{T,1}-1,0)$. When $S_{T,1} and S_{T,2}$ are geometric Brownian motions, $f=S_{T,2}/S_{T,1}$ is a geometric Brownian motion as well. More rigorously, we can the Ito's lemma to $f=S_{T,2}/S_{T,1}$:

$df = \frac{\partial f}{\partial S_1}dS_1+\frac{\partial f}{\partial S_2}dS_2+0.5*\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial S_1^2}dS_1^2+0.5*\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial S_2^2}dS_2^2+\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial S_1\partial S_2}dS_1dS_2=(\mu_2-\mu_1+\sigma_1^2-\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2)fdt - \sigma_1fdW_{t,1}+\sigma_2fdW_{t,2} = (\mu_2-\mu_1+\sigma_1^2-\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2)fdt+\sqrt{\sigma_1^2-2\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2+\sigma_1^2}fdW_{t,3}$

So here is my doubt, why $- \sigma_1fdW_{t,1}+\sigma_2fdW_{t,2} = \sqrt{\sigma_1^2-2\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2+\sigma_1^2}fdW_{t,3}$ holds?


Define the process $$X_t=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\sigma_2^2+\sigma_1^2-2\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2}}\left(\sigma_2W_{t,2}-\sigma_1W_{t,1}\right)$$ It is a martingale because it is a linear combinations of martingales.

Calculate $d<X_t,X_t>$ $$d<X_t,X_t>=\frac{1}{\sigma_2^2+\sigma_1^2-2\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2}\left(\sigma_2^2+\sigma_1^2-2\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2\right)dt=dt$$

By Levy's Characterization of Brownian Motion, $X_t$ is a Brownian motion, and we rename it $$X_t=W_{t,3}$$

Finally, differentiate the first question


|improve this answer|||||
  • $\begingroup$ thanks a lot for helping me again, I really appreciate it:) $\endgroup$ – M00000001 Dec 19 '19 at 20:03

Thanks a lot for the above great answer:). Here I also added the link for Levy's Characterization of Brownian Motion: http://individual.utoronto.ca/normand/Documents/MATH5501/Project-3/Levy_characterization_of_Brownian_motion.pdf

|improve this answer|||||

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.