7
$\begingroup$

Let's say we have sold a call option, x, on a share and we have 2 other call options, y & z, with different strikes and maturities to try and achieve a portfolio that is both Gamma and Vega neutral. We just need to solve the following system of equations:

$$\begin{bmatrix} V_x \\ \Gamma_x \\ \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} V_y & V_z \\ \Gamma_y & \Gamma_z \end{bmatrix} % \begin{bmatrix} y \\ z \end{bmatrix} $$

However, a solution only exists if the 2x2 matrix above is invertible, i.e. $V_y \Gamma_z-V_z\Gamma_y\ne0$.

Is there any reason why the solution wouldn't exist or a name given to the situation when it happens? Or does this happen just by chance, that the determinant is 0?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @noob2 Isn't $ \mathbb{P}\left[\omega \in \Omega \mid V_y \Gamma_z-V_z\Gamma_y = 0 \right] = 0$? $\endgroup$ – SmurfAcco Mar 18 at 8:31
2
$\begingroup$

In Black-Scholes world, we have:

$$V_y= \sigma_y \tau_y S^2 \Gamma_y $$

and similarly for $z$.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! So the only way we could have the determinant being non-zero is if the time until expiration is different for both call options. $\endgroup$ – 383930283423 Mar 18 at 23:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes, assuming flat implied vol (same for all strikes and times to expiriez), then selected times to expiries must be different. $\endgroup$ – ir7 Mar 19 at 0:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.