Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
When I first learn about finance, a bond with continuous yield was priced via
$$Z = e^{-rT},$$ where $r$ is the yield, $T$ the time to maturity.
But, when I learned about stochastic interest rate models like Ho-Lee and Hull & White, etc. the formula changed to
$$Z= e^{A-Br},$$ where $A$, $B$ are functions.
What is the reason for it? Is there any reference which deal with this? I need explanation that is intuitive.
In general, the time $t$ price of a zero-coupon bond maturing at time $T$ is given by \begin{align*} P(t,T) &= \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}\left[\exp\left(-\int_t^T r_s\mathrm{d}s\right) \Bigg|\mathcal{F}_t\right]. \end{align*} Here, $r_t$ is the short rate, i.e. the cost for borrowing time from $t$ until $t+\mathrm{d}t$. This formula follows directly from the absence of arbitrage.
If $r_t\equiv r$ is constant, then \begin{align*} P(t,T)=e^{-r(T-t)}, \end{align*} which is the first formula you mentioned.
If $r_t$ is time-varying, you have to used the above equation with the conditional expectations. As it happens, in the Ho-Lee and the Hull-White models (and others too), this conditional expectation can be written as \begin{align*} P(t,T)=e^{A(t,T)+r_tB(t,T)}, \end{align*} for suitable functions $A,B$, see here.
So both equations you mentioned are special cases of a more general formula. The first special case assumes constant interest rates, the second one assumes normally distributed short rates.
