2
$\begingroup$

Thank you for your help everyone, and I apologise beforehand if this is a lousy or dumb question.

I am looking to read up more on Quadratic Loss & Linex Loss, and forecast optimality. In my university text, we were told that the quadratic loss function is essentially the squared-error of the loss function, or square of the difference between actual and forecasted value, as shown below:

enter image description here

We are then told that the Linear-exponential loss function is an asymmetric loss function that tends towards the Quadratic loss function as a tends towards zero, as shown below:

enter image description here

My question is how can the Linex loss function tend towards the quadratic loss function as a tends towards zero? I might be a bit clueless and missing the math here but I can't seem to prove that as a tends towards zero, Linex function tends to Quadratic function.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

It just needs the power series(Maclaurin) expansion: $e^{x}=1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!}+\frac{x^3}{3!}+\dots$

Take the Linex function:

$L\left(y,\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)=\frac{2}{a^2}\left[e^{a\left(y-\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)}-a\left(y-\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)-1\right]$

and substitute the power series for the exponential term:

$L\left(y,\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)=\frac{2}{a^2}\left[1+a\left(y-\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)+\frac{a^2\left(y-\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)^2}{2!}+\frac{a^3\left(y-\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)^3}{3!}+\dots-a\left(y-\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)-1\right]$

And then simplify:

$L\left(y,\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)=\frac{2}{a^2}\left[\frac{a^2\left(y-\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)^2}{2!}+\frac{a^3\left(y-\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)^3}{3!}+\dots\right]=\left(y-\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)^2 +\frac{2a\left(y-\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)^3}{3!}+\dots$

And then the limit is easily seen to be the quadratic:

$\lim_{a \to 0} L\left(y,\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)=\left(y-\overset{\wedge}{y}\right)^2$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Magic, thank you for your help! I totally did not think to use the Maclaurin's. $\endgroup$
    – Kai
    Jun 14, 2020 at 10:21
0
$\begingroup$

Just apply L Hospital's rule two times on the Linex loss function, you will obtain the required result.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.