I am new to the topic of Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance, and have implemented it in R for the first time.

Now if I calculate the cumulative return of the CPPI portfolio corresponding to different floors ($100$%, $95$%, ..., $0$%) i get the following result:

For $100$%, I obviously invest everything into a bond all the time, thus my return is the risk-free interest rate $r=1$%.

For $0$%, I invest everything into the risky market, yielding a return equal to that of the market $\mu=10$%.

Now in between both extremes, I do not quite understand the behaviour of the realized returns: They are negative for high floor values ($90$% - $60$%), but then suddenly become positive for floor $\le 40$% finally converging to $\mu$.

Why is that? Why doesn´t it interpolate, but drop off first?

  • $\begingroup$ Are you comparing returns on a given history of stock index prices or are you comparing average returns on a set of histories generated by Monte Carlo simulation? $\endgroup$
    – noob2
    Jul 17 '20 at 13:37
  • $\begingroup$ @noob2 Returns on a given history of the MSCI World $\endgroup$ Jul 17 '20 at 13:46
  • $\begingroup$ Caution: The returns are path dependent so the returns on a single history are not necessarily of great importance, and in particular do not necessarily represent the returns going forward or on a different time frame in history. It is a good way to test the code but not a good way to choose a floor value. $\endgroup$
    – noob2
    Jul 17 '20 at 14:04
  • $\begingroup$ @noob2 I understand, it was more a toy example. But still it left me wondering how it is possible that even with a lower floor value, we achieve less return despite the market performing well overall. To be precise: For floor=$0.9$ we go below the risk-free interest rate. Only as we approach floor=$0$, we achieve a return close to the market return. Why is is this dip in the beginning so prominent? Is this a flaw in the CPPI or in my code? $\endgroup$ Jul 17 '20 at 14:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I will add this, then I will shut up and let others comment: CPPI is good if the goal is to arrive at time T with wealth equal to at least X. It is not helpful as a way to get a good return given risk between now and then. A fixed mix (eg. 60% equities, 40% fixed income) is probably better for the latter objective. "If you don't need insurance don't buy it". $\endgroup$
    – noob2
    Jul 17 '20 at 18:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.