I'm new here. I was wondering what the well-known ATMF implied vol approximation mentioned on page 2 in Bergomi Smile Dynamics IV: $$S_T = \frac{s_T}{6\sqrt{T}}.$$

I cannot find any reference about this.


Let $$\ln\left(S_T/S_t\right) $$

have mean $\mu_\tau$ and standard deviation $\sigma_\tau$, where $\tau=T-t$, and density of its standardized form $$ X= \frac{\ln(S_T/S_t)-\mu_\tau}{\sigma_\tau} $$

approximated by Gram-Charlier expansion

$$ f_X(x) = \phi(x) - \gamma_{1\tau} \frac{1}{3!} D^3 \phi(x) + \gamma_{2\tau} \frac{1}{4!} D^4 \phi(x), $$

with $\phi$ being standard normal density and $\gamma_{1\tau}$ and $\gamma_{2\tau}$ being third (skewness) and fourth (kurtosis) cumulants.

One can then price a call option with strike $K$ against density $f_X$ and then imply, via Black-Scholes formula, standard deviation:

$$ \hat{\sigma}_{K\tau} = \sigma_\tau\left[1- \gamma_{1\tau} \frac{1}{3!} d_{K\tau} - \gamma_{2\tau} \frac{1}{4!} (1- d_{K\tau}^2) \right] $$


$$ d_{K\tau} = \frac{\ln(S_t/K)-r\tau +0.5\sigma_\tau^2}{\sigma_\tau}. $$

Detailed proof is available here.

This in turn gives:

$$ \frac{\partial \hat{\sigma}_{K\tau}}{\partial \ln K}\bigg|_{K=S_t\mathrm{e}^{rt}} = \gamma_{1\tau} \frac{1}{3!}. $$

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much! Basically, we approximate the standardized r.v. by the Gram-Charlier expansion, and then use that one to price the option and eliminate some high order terms to obtain the iv. $\endgroup$ – JuniorQuant Jul 25 '20 at 20:05
  • $\begingroup$ I also read the book, Stochastic Volatility Modelling, written by Bergomi. In Chapter 5 Appendix B, it provides another approach, but a lot of steps are skipped: It mentioned that use the order 1 vol., and express the derivatives of $P_0$, which is the price, in terms of derivative of $\rho_0$, which is the density of $log(S_T/F_T)$, and use the BS expression of gamma yield then obtain the $\mathcal{S}_T$. Any comments on this would be appreciated! $\endgroup$ – JuniorQuant Jul 25 '20 at 20:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JuniorQuant I think it’s best you make that another question. $\endgroup$ – Bob Jansen Jul 26 '20 at 10:31
  • $\begingroup$ @BobJansen I see. I will make another one. Thanks for pointing out this! $\endgroup$ – JuniorQuant Jul 26 '20 at 14:17
  • $\begingroup$ I have two questions for the proof in here: 1. For equation (31), the authors mentioned the arbitrage condition. I was wondering what's that condition; 2. For the identity (32): $SN'(d_1) = Ke^{-rT}N'(d_2)$, is there any explanation for this equality? Thank you for your time and help! $\endgroup$ – JuniorQuant Jul 26 '20 at 23:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.