1
$\begingroup$

After running an optimisation using a quadratic utility (CRRA) function I calculate an CVAR that is equal to the VAR especially for very small risk-aversion levels ($\gamma$=1 and $\gamma$=2 e.g.). What is the intuition behind this finding? I would think that the skewness and kurtosis are approximately normal and these approach one another? Is it even an informative finding?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can you give a specific example with some numbers? $\endgroup$ – phdstudent Jul 26 at 20:40
2
$\begingroup$

That is incredibly unlikely for a continuous distribution -- though possible for a distribution with a part that is not absolutely continuous, i.e. is atomic.

The way to see this is to remember that the $\alpha$% CVaR/ES/TCE is defined as:

$CVaR(r,\alpha) = E(r|r\leq Var(r,\alpha))$.

Thus getting an $\alpha$-CVaR equal in magnitude to $\alpha$-VaR would imply there are no returns below the $\alpha$-VaR level.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.