It is well-known that asset return correlations of stocks increase during market downturns. But are there any general properties derived from empirical observation or evidence regarding by how much magnitudes in correlations change before and after the downturn? e.g. based on either the levels of correlations, or individual return distribution properties per pair, before the downturn.

For example, before the market collapse, the pair-wise correlations between 3 hypothetical stocks $A$, $B$ and $C$ are

corr(A,B)   0.1
corr(A,C)   0.3
corr(B,C)   0.6

After the downturn (or maybe sometime during it), what can be said about how much these correlations increase (given that we know they will not decrease).

Could it be that each of the three correlations double? increase by 10%? Only one of the three correlations increases by 10% while the other two only increase by 50%? If so, which.

Do low (higher) correlations before, signal higher (much higher) correlations after? Empirically, what has been observed? are asset expected returns, distributions or variances before the downturn of any use as indicators of the impending bump in correlation?

  • $\begingroup$ It is an interesting question but perhaps the concept of correlation is not the appropriate concept, rather one should use the notion of 'tail dependence' (which is more general). $\endgroup$ – noob2 Aug 28 at 1:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.