We have a contract whose value is $A(S_t,t) = S_t^3$ at all times, not just at expiration. $S_t$, the underlying stock, follows a Geometric Brownian Motion, $\frac{dS}{S} = \mu dt + \sigma dB$. How would we go about showing that this is inconsistent with no-arbitrage pricing?

I thought a potential solution could be to show that it is not a Martingale under the Q-measure. Basically, we start by assuming that $A(S_t, t)$ is a Martingale, which implies that $e^{-rt}E^Q[A_t] = A_0 = S_0^3$. But, under the risk-neutral measure, we know that $S_t = S_0e^{(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2})t + \sigma \sqrt{t} Z^Q}$ where $Z$ is standard normal. It follows that $A(S_t, t) = S_t^3 = S_0^3e^{3(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2})t + 3\sigma \sqrt{t} Z^Q}$. Computing the expectation $e^{-rt}E^Q[S_t^3] = S_0^3 e^{-rt}\int_{z^*}^{\infty} \frac{dz}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{\frac{-z^2}{2}}e^{3(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2})t + 3\sigma \sqrt{t} Z^Q}$ we obtain $S_0^3 e^{2rt + 3\sigma^2t}$. Because $S_0^3 e^{2rt + 3\sigma^2t} \neq S_0^3$ we conclude that $A(S_t, t)$ is not a Martingale, so the fact that the contract has value $S_t^3$ at all times is inconsistent with no-abitrage pricing.

Would something like this work? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks.


1 Answer 1


Under the risk-neutral measure by application of Ito: $$ dS^3_t = 3 \left[ (r + \sigma^2)S^3_t dt + \sigma S^3_t dW_t \right] $$ The risk-neutral drift is not the risk-free rate and hence $S_t^3 \; \forall t$ cannot be the price of a claim or any other tradable asset.

So basically along the same lines as your proof, but without calculating expectations etc. Just need to look at the local drift.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, I think this is the most straightforward way. $\endgroup$ Oct 16, 2020 at 11:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.