When using the Black 76 model for pricing European index options I've often seen people use 2 different rates: the typical risk free rate used to get the discount factor, and a growth rate used to get the forward price. The adjusted equation for a call option (assuming no dividends) using $r_g$ as the growth rate and $r_f$ as the risk free rate would be

$$C = e^{-r_fT}[e^{r_gT}SN(d_1) - KN(d_2)]$$

I'm not totally sure what rates to use for each of these and I am having trouble finding information about it online. What is the reasoning behind having two separate rates? What would someone typically use for each rate (for example LIBOR forward for $r_g$ and OIS discount for $r_f$)?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In Black‘s model, $e^{r_s (T-t)}S_t$ should equal the futures price $F_{t,T}$ of the underlying. Thus you could back out $r_s$ given $t,T,F_{t,T}, S_t$. Or you simply plug in $F_{t,T}$ in the first place ... $\endgroup$ – Kermittfrog Feb 4 at 3:31

As @Kermittfrog said in the comment, in Black formula for options on futures price you need to insert the futures price $F$:

$$C = e^{-rT}[FN(d_1) - KN(d_2)]$$

where $r$ is the discounting rate. Here, $d_1$ depends only on $F$ (no rate involved).

For Black-Scholes formula for options on spot price (assume asset pays no dividend to keep it clean), we have:

$$C = e^{-rT}[e^{r_RT} S N(d_1) - KN(d_2)]$$

where $r$ is the discounting rate and $r_R$ is the financing rate of the underlying asset (if it can be repoed, it will be lower, if not, it will be higher). Here, $d_1$ depends on $S$ and $r_R$.

The discount rate $r$ depends on whether the option itself is collateralized (there is CSA) or not (there is no CSA), so it will be a collateral rate or a funding rate, respectively. See Piterbarg's Funding beyond discounting article.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.