1
$\begingroup$

How are "official" FX rates calculated? Are these given by an average across all big dealers or brokerage systems (eg EBS, Reuters)?

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Many central banks publish official spot rates, usually once a day near local-time close.

For example, if you have a non-delivery contract involving Brazil real (BRL), then you most likely get the official BRL PTAX (BRL09) reported by the Banco Central do Brasil on SISBACEN Data System under transaction code PTAX-800 ("Consultas de Câmbio" or Exchange Rate Inquiry), Option 5 ("Cotacões para Contabilidade" or Rates for Accounting Purposes) and published around 1:15 p.m., São Paulo time. It is an average of several observations during the day. Likewise, if you have a non-delivery contract involving Argentina peso, you get ARS MAE (AR05) - the rate published by the Mercado Electronic Abierto on its website at approximately 3 p.m., Buenos Aires time, which represents the volume weighted average of all trades in the electronic market for this day in Argentina. Etc.

But if you're looking for intraday, or time other than their close, or forward rather than spot rates, then there are just "unofficial" data vendors. The most popular spot and forward rates seems to be WM/Refinitiv published by State Street subsidiary WM and Refinitiv (former Reuters). Of the many FX platforms, CME's Electronic Broking Services (EBS) is probably the best known.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ECB also publishes (spot) rates, would you consider those official? $\endgroup$
    – Bob Jansen
    Mar 1 at 15:05
  • $\begingroup$ yes, of course! many CBs publish official spot rates, usually once a day near local-time close. I can't think of any official forward rates, though. Maybe I should edit and clarify this. $\endgroup$ Mar 1 at 15:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Some EM CBs publish forwards (or swaps), e.g. bot.or.th/App/BTWS_STAT/statistics/…. However, seems they are just redistributing the Reuters data based on that link..! $\endgroup$
    – user42108
    Mar 1 at 16:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ECB rates are for "information purposes" only and should not be used for for transaction purposes. For these cases you would prefer IOSCO compliant fixing like WMR or BFIX. $\endgroup$
    – AKdemy
    Apr 29 at 11:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ or BMR compliant $\endgroup$
    – AKdemy
    Apr 29 at 11:57
2
$\begingroup$

The FX market is incredibly fragmented. There are no 'official' or correct FX rates, rather there is data that is compiled and distributed by reputable sources, such as central banks, or electronic dealer platforms, or even large trading house own pricing data.

This data may well conflict with each other, but it does not mean it is incorrect.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Here's an example of how exactly FX reference rates are being calculated for the exchange-traded USDRUB pair (USDRUB MCDF Curncy in Bloomberg, USDFIXME=RTS in Refinitiv). In this particular case, it's a 5-minute average of 300 per-second calculated "fixes" each determined as a weighted sum of VWAP and weighted mid-price. The multiple layers of averaging and weighting are not surprising given how much is tied to and settled based on these rates. At the same time, the calculated rates can be verified by anyone with access to Level 2 and last trade feed.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I initially just commented but I think it warrants an answer.

Whenever someone needs to compute an amount payable or the value of a financial instrument or contract, or wants to track returns of funds, compute indices (see Appendix I and II), compute (performance) fees and the like, there must be a uniformly agreed way of doing this. In other words, there must be a benchmark for transaction purposes.

Official (in many cases) means it's something that is not only reliable, transparent and representative but also compliant with benchmark regulations like IOSCO or EU BMR which carries over to the UK via the onshored BMR. Two of these officially approved fixings are WMR and BFIX. It is also important that it cannot be reverse engineered. Institutions are not only using the fixings for the aforementioned reasons, but also frequently agree in transacting at the fix (prior to knowing it). Therefore, the methodology must be in a way that it cannot be manipulated.

Thinking of derivatives, the term sheet defines what the reference rate is. While the ECB is obviously a trusted authority, it discourages the use of their FX rates as official fixings and wants them to be used for information purposes only.

This is different in different countries. PTAX in Brazil is widely used, also CFETS in China and so forth.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.