1
$\begingroup$

I am reading Shreve's Stochastic Calculus for Finance II. He states on pages 110 and 111 that,

$$E[exp(\sigma m-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \tau_m)] = 1$$ $$E[exp(-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \tau_m)] = e^{-\sigma m}$$

I understand that the top equation is a martingale and should thus have a constant expectation but I don't understand why both equations are true. I tried taking the expectations of both equations by taking the integral from 0 to $m$, but that doesn't work since I get

$$ E[exp(-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \tau_m)] = \int_0^m exp(-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \tau_m) dt = \frac{2-2exp{(-\frac{ms^2}{2}})}{s^2} \color{red} \ne e^{\sigma m}$$

How do I prove in detail both expectations?

Here are the pages for reference.

Shreve Stochastic Calculus for Finance Volume II, page 110

Shreve Stochastic Calculus for Finance Volume II, page 111

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Given that $exp(\sigma m-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \tau_m)$ is a martingale, you just need to substitute $m = 0$ into it to find the value of its expectation, as for any martingale $Z_t$ we have that $E[Z_t] = Z_0$.

If you are really interested in an algebric proof, you need to find first the distribution of $\tau_m$. You can find it on the link below or you can try to prove it by yourself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_Gaussian_distribution

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.