1
$\begingroup$

I would like to now how to solve the PDE of the affine structure under Vasicek.I am delineating the steps:

First let's posit the OU process under a Risk Neutral Measure such as : \begin{align*} \mathrm{d}r_t=\mu(t,r_t)\mathrm{d}t+\sigma(t,r_t)\mathrm{d}W_t \end{align*}

Then comes the bond PDE:

\begin{align*} P_t + \mu(t,r) P_r + \frac{1}{2}\sigma(t,r)^2P_{rr} -rP=0, \end{align*} We Write the penny zero coupon bond's formula and mixed it with the Original PDE,using a latent $r_t$ variable :

\begin{align*} P(t,T)=e^{A(t,T)-r_tB(t,T)} \end{align*}

\begin{align*} P_t(t,T) &=\big(A_t(t,T)-r_tB_t(t,T)\big)\cdot P(t,T), \\ P_r(t,T) &= -B(t,T)\cdot P(t,T), \\ P_{rr}(t,T) &= B(t,T)^2\cdot P(t,T). \end{align*}

\begin{align*} A_t(t,T) - \mu(t,r) B(t,T) + \frac{1}{2}\sigma(t,r)^2B(t,T)^2 +(-B_t(t,T)-1)r &=0. \end{align*}

In the Vasicek case, $\mu(t,r_t)=\kappa(\theta-r_t)$ and $\sigma(t,r_t)=\sigma$.Afterward the calculations are straightforward:

\begin{align*} A_t(t,T) - \kappa \theta B(t,T) + \kappa r B(t,T) + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2B(t,T)^2 +(-B_t(t,T)-1)r &=0 \\ \implies A_t(t,T) - \kappa \theta B(t,T) + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2B(t,T)^2-(1+B_t(t,T)-\kappa B(t,T))r &=0. \end{align*}

And we end up with two equations such :

\begin{align*} \begin{cases} A_t(t,T) - \kappa \theta B(t,T) + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2B(t,T)^2 &= 0, \\ 1+B_t(t,T)-\kappa B(t,T) &= 0,\\ u.c : A(T,T)=B(T,T)=0 \end{cases} \end{align*} However I don't understand the development we must do so as to find $B_t(t,T) = e^{-k(T-t)}$ and hence $B(t,T) = \frac{-1+e^{-k(T-t)}}{k}$.

Thank you for your time

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

We begin with the equation $1+B_t(t,T)-kB(t,T) = 0 \quad(1)$

\begin{align} (1) & \iff e^{-kt}+e^{-kt}B_t(t,T)+(-k)e^{-kt}B(t,T) = 0 \\ & \iff e^{-kt}+ \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(e^{-kt}B(t,T)\right) = 0 \\ & \iff \int_t^Te^{-ku}du+ \int_t^T\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\left(e^{-ku}B(t,T)\right)du = 0 \\ & \iff \int_t^Te^{-ku}du+ \int_t^T\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\left(e^{-ku}B(t,T)\right)du = 0 \\ & \iff\frac{e^{-kt}-e^{-kT}}{k} +\left(e^{-kT}B(T,T) - e^{-kt}B(t,T)\right) = 0 \tag{2}\\ \end{align} From $(2)$, you can deduce the closed form expression of $B(t,T)$.

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

there's a great chapter going over this entire derivation in "Stochastic Calculus for Finance II: Continuous-Time Models" by Shreve. Let me know if you cant download it. It's how I learned this confusing ass stochastic calc stuff :)

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to Quant.SE! :) Shreve's book is certainly great and covers short rate models. Your current answer is more of a comment. Perhaps you'd like to elaborate a bit on the details you've read in Shreve's book? $\endgroup$ – Kevin Mar 11 at 0:17
  • $\begingroup$ @Kevin Sorry don't have time to elaborate. But Chapter 10 of that book goes over the complete derivation $\endgroup$ – eruiz Mar 11 at 21:33
  • $\begingroup$ I checked and didn’t find $\endgroup$ – lays Mar 13 at 20:32
  • $\begingroup$ @lays Chapter 6.5: Interest Rate Models. Page 272 $\endgroup$ – eruiz Mar 13 at 20:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.