# Corner portfolios

This is more a theoretical problem rather than a technical one.

I am looking for a clear and rigorous definition of corner portfolios and I like to understand more precisely their relation with the mean-variance/minimum variance frontier.

1. Does the two-funds theorem apply to the entire minimum-variance frontier or just to the efficient frontier? In other words both frontiers can be derived with a linear combination of portfolios suitably chosen?

2. Is it correct asserting that deriving the efficient frontier by recurring to the two-funds theorem requires the use of two efficient portfolios that are also corner portfolios for the linear combination?

3. Is it correct that the two-funds separation theorem is valid only when there is no corner portfolio between the two used in the linear combination at least when deriving the efficient frontier? (Efficient Asset Management by Michaud)

Unfortunately, in some books and papers "mean-variance optimal" and "mean-variance efficient" are used interchangeably.

The corner portfolios arise in the second case only (the extra constraints problem). As we move across the efficient frontier, the weights change. At some point a weight might decrease to zero and if we move further would become negative. That is a corner point or corner portfolio. The asset whose weight has decreased to zero must be kicked out of the portfolio to satisfy the positivity constraint (or other inequality constraint). Or at some point another asset can be brought in with $$\ge 0$$ weight. So the names of the assets in the portfolio change at each corner point, with a name dropping out or a new name coming in.
On the other hand in the no inequality constraint problem every portfolio consists of all $$n$$ stocks (some with positive weights, some negative) and here it is true that an arbitrary portfolio on the frontier can be formed from linear combination of any two frontier portfolios.