1
$\begingroup$

The setting

Let stocks $A$, $B$, and $C$ are cointegrated. Moreover, we know the weights of the cointegrated portfolio (scaled so that the absolute value of the maximum weight is $0.5$):

  • $w_A = 0.15$
  • $w_B = 0.35$
  • $w_C = -0.5$

And one fine day, the cointegrated portfolio - a stationary time series, of course - goes below its first percentile: time to buy the portfolio and make some statistical arbitrage!

Had a trader to go long on this portfolio, he could just buy $nw_A$ shares, buy $nw_B$ shares, and short $n|w_C|$ shares provided that the ratio between the weights reflected the balance stated by the cointegration relation ($n > 0$ is any integer).

Had the same trader to start a long Delta position on this portfolio, he could use the weights $w_i$ as a reference to pick the options he liked the most and set the Delta, $\Delta_i$, of each position $i$ equal to $w_i$: the simplest Gamma-positive position would be to buy Call options on $A$ and $B$ with $\Delta_i = w_i$ and to buy Put options on $C$ with $\Delta_C = w_C$ and this would be like buying a Call option on the cointegrated portfolio.

The question

Let you want to build a position on the cointegrated portfolio that is more complex than a single (synthetic) naked Call/Put option like a ratio spread 1x2 or a butterfly; the only constrain is that the "view" shall be the same, that is, the portfolio is too cheap and we shall bet on the mean reversion.

For example, let $s_t$ be the cointegrated portfolio like in the picture below and you want to build this payoff (1x2 ratio spread):

enter image description here

How would you do that? Which options on $A$, $B$, and $C$ would you pick and why?

$\endgroup$

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.