0
$\begingroup$

In a multi-period market model, let's say we have $d+1$ assets $(S^0,S)=(S^0,S^1,\dots,S^d) $, where $S^0$ is the riskless asset, invested in a money market account. In continuous-time finance I usually see this asset defined as $S_t^0=e^{rt}$ and in discrete-time finance i often see it defined as $S_t^0=(1+r)^t$. Is there any reason that the definitions differ, other than $(1+r)^t$ being easier to calculate in discrete time? Thanks for clearing up my confusion!

$\endgroup$
1
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Hi: My best guess would be because, in continuous time, interest is assume to compound continuously and, in discrete time, it is assumed to compound discretely. $\endgroup$
    – mark leeds
    Jun 30 at 19:11
4
$\begingroup$

Let us say we have a yearly interest rate of $r$ that compounds over $n$ periods. With annual compounding that means $n=1$, with semi-annual compounding that means $n=2$ and with daily compounding that means $n=365$.

We can calculate the value of putting \$1 into the bank account at time zero and withdrawing it after $n$ periods at time $t$ as $$ \left(1+\frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt} $$ For the case of continuous time it is assume that interest is compounded continuously making the number of periods go towards infinity $$ \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(1+\frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt}=e^{rt} $$ So the continuous time bank account is just the continuous limit of the discrete time bank account.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent, thank you! $\endgroup$
    – phhhlpfk
    Jun 30 at 19:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.