6
$\begingroup$

Hey how to simulate Levy processes? I have no problem with Wiener process and compound Poisson process, I also know how to simulate Variance Gamma process but I have no idea how to simulate for example Meixner process, CGMY process and other Levy processes with infinite activity.

$\endgroup$
10
$\begingroup$

You have many different options. Firstly, you know the characteristic function for the log stock price and, using inversion, you can recover the (inverse) distribution and density function and simulate from these using a uniform draw. That's the brute force approach.


The variance gamma process is typically represented as a difference of gamma processes or a subordinated (time changed) Brownian motion. This makes Monte Carlo simulation easy. Madan and Yor (2008, JCF) show how to do this analysis for CGMY and Meixner processes. In more detail, they show how to simulate the CGMY process via the usual $$ X=\theta Y_t+W_{Y_t},$$ where $Y_t$ is the subordinator.

Alternatively, they set \begin{align*} X=\frac{G-M}{2}H_t+\sqrt{H_t}Z, \end{align*} where $Z\sim N(0,1)$ and \begin{align*} H_t = \delta t + \sum_{j=1}^\infty y_j\mathbf{1}_{\{\Gamma_j<t\}}\mathbf{1}_{\{h_y>u_{3j}\}}, \end{align*} where $\delta$ is a constant, $\Gamma_j$ a sum of jump times and $u_{3j}$ a sequence of uniform random variables. [All details are in the paper, Section 4.1.] A similar expression exists for the Meixner process where \begin{align} X=\frac{a}{b}\tau+\sqrt{\tau}Z. \end{align}


A problem is that the above analysis replaces small jumps with their expectation. This introduces some error in the simulations. Rosinski (2007, SPA) finds an expressions using an infinite sum of independent uniform distributions. The only remaining simulation error is then due to truncation.

Poirot and Tankov (2006) find a change of measure that reduces the CGMY process to a simpler process that can be simulated exactly. This way, they can simulate the increments of a CGMY process.

Hirsa (2013, Section 6.7.6) shows how to simulate sample paths for the variance gamma with stochastic arrival (VGSA) process, a stochastic volatility Lévy process from Carr et al. (2003, MF), by drawing from the gamma and normal distribution.

Finally, Ballotta and Kyriakou (2014, JFM) also look at the simulation of sample paths from the CGMY model. They essentially suggest the brute force approach mentioned above, see their section 4.3.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ So in brute force I have to invert CH of increments of CGMY process to get density function (for example using COS method), then calculate CDF based on this density function and finally draw a sample from (0,1) uniform distribution and invert CDF at simulated point? Is it OK? $\endgroup$
    – Math122
    Jul 14 at 19:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Math122 yes, that sounds about right to me! Try it first with a geometric Brownian motion where you know everything in closed form to check your inversion code. Then, replace the characteristic function of the Brownian motion by the one from CGMY or Meixner. $\endgroup$
    – Kevin
    Jul 16 at 11:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.