Following the question that I have asked on this link and response obtained, I have managed to price a 3x6 FRA using QuantLib Python, using the following codes:

import QuantLib as ql
today = ql.Date(30, 6, 2020)
ql.Settings.instance().evaluationDate = today
calendar = ql.UnitedStates()
startDate = calendar.advance(today, ql.Period('3M'))
maturityDate = calendar.advance(startDate, ql.Period('3M'))

spotDates = [ql.Date(30, 6, 2020), ql.Date(31, 12, 2020), ql.Date(30, 6, 2021)]
spotRates = [0.05, 0.05, 0.05]

dayConvention = ql.Thirty360()

compounding = ql.Simple
compoundingFrequency = ql.Annual

spotCurve = ql.ZeroCurve(spotDates, spotRates, dayConvention, calendar, ql.Linear(), compounding, compoundingFrequency)
spotCurveHandle = ql.YieldTermStructureHandle(spotCurve)

index = ql.USDLibor(ql.Period('3M'), spotCurveHandle)
index.addFixing(ql.Date(26, 6, 2020), 0.05)
notional = 100000
rate = 0.06

fra = ql.ForwardRateAgreement(startDate, maturityDate, ql.Position.Long, rate, notional, index, spotCurveHandle)
print('NPV:', fra.NPV())

The NPV obtained is:

NPV: -288.3302632825472

However, when manually recomputing the answer, a slight difference from QuantLib's NPV is being obtained.

My manual computation is as follows, based on 30/360 day count convention:

My yearFraction is obtained using the following line:

ql.Thirty360().yearFraction(startDate, maturityDate)

And my NPV is:


Can someone please explain why this difference is arising?



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.