1
$\begingroup$

In Bouzoubaa and Osseiran page 68 equation 5.3, the authors discuss delta hedging a call written for asset $S_1$ using a different but correlated underlying asset $S_2$. The authors provide the following formula.

$$ \frac{\partial S_2}{\partial S_1}=\rho_{1,2}\frac{\sigma_2S_2}{\sigma_1S_1}, $$

where $\rho_{1,2}$ is the correlation between $S_1$ and $S_2$ and $\sigma$ refers to volatility (standard deviation).

My Question

Should this formula be

$$ \frac{\partial S_2}{\partial S_1}=\rho_{1,2}\frac{\sigma_2}{\sigma_1}, $$

instead? Because this would be the $\hat{\beta}$ in an OLS regression (see here). Intuitively, if we fit

$$S_2 = \hat{\alpha} + \hat{\beta} S_1+\varepsilon,$$

then

$$ \frac{\partial S_2}{\partial S_1}=\hat{\beta}=\rho_{1,2}\frac{\sigma_2}{\sigma_1}. $$

Am I missing something? What are the terms $S_1$ and $S_2$ doing in the printed formula?

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

I'd tackle this using some handwavery application of the bivariate conditional normal distribution to the geometric brownian motions:

For a multivariate normally distributed random variable $X$, partitioned into two blocks $X_1,X_2$, i.e. $X\equiv\left(X_1,X_2\right)^T$ with zero mean and covariance matrix

$$ \Sigma\equiv\begin{pmatrix} \Sigma_{11} & \Sigma_{12} \\ \Sigma_{21} & \Sigma_{22} \end{pmatrix}$$

the conditional distribution of $X_1$ given $X_2$ is also Normal, with mean end variance

$$ \begin{align} \mathrm{E}(X_1|X_2=x_2)&=\Sigma_{12}\Sigma_{22}^{-1}x_2\\ \mathrm{V}(X_1|X_2=x_2)&=\Sigma_{11}-\Sigma_{12}\Sigma_{22}^{-1}\Sigma_{21} \end{align} $$

In the bivariate case $\mathrm{E}(x_1|x_2)=\frac{\sigma_1\sigma_2\rho}{\sigma_2^2}x_2=\rho\frac{\sigma_1}{\sigma_2}x_2$ and $\mathrm{V}(x_1|x_2)=\sigma_1^2(1-\rho^2)$

How it applies to your question

Let $S_1,S_2$ follow a bivariate geometric Brownian motion:

$$ \begin{align} \frac{dS_i}{S_i}&=\mu_i dt+\sigma_idW_i \end{align} $$ with $dW_1dW_2=\rho dt$. Then

$$ \begin{pmatrix}dS_1&dS_2\end{pmatrix}^T\sim\mathbf{N}\left(\mathbf{0}\times dt,\begin{pmatrix}S_1^2\sigma_1^2&S_1S_2\sigma_1 \sigma_2\rho\\ S_1S_2 \sigma_1 \sigma_2 \rho&S_2^2\sigma_2^2\end{pmatrix}dt\right) $$

Applying the above:

$$ \mathrm{E}\left(x_1|x_2\right)=\frac{S_1S_2\sigma_1\sigma_2\rho}{S_2^2\sigma_2^2}x_2=\frac{S_1}{S_2}\frac{\sigma_1}{\sigma_2}\rho x_2 $$

and

$$ \mathrm{E}\left(x_2|x_1\right)=\frac{S_1S_2\sigma_1\sigma_2\rho}{S_1^2\sigma_1^2}x_1=\frac{S_2}{S_1}\frac{\sigma_2}{\sigma_1}\rho x_1 $$

i.e.

$$ \mathrm{E}(dS_2)/dS_1=\frac{S_1S_2\sigma_1\sigma_2\rho}{S_1^2\sigma_1^2}=\frac{S_2}{S_1}\frac{\sigma_2}{\sigma_1}\rho $$

which yields the statement from the book.

HTH?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.