The shape of the volatility curve in index options trading typically shows that the 'just' OTM Calls (ITM Puts) options have the lowest implied volatility.

If you are long an ATM Call and the market moves down I see two results;

  1. That Call should now be approaching the bottom of the curve and its implied volatility will decrease
  2. Volatility as a whole should increase due to the move to the downside

So my question is, which effect will dominate?

I feel I may be overstating the effect of result 2 above and that we would need a pretty violent move for volatility to be materially bid.


2 Answers 2


Item 1 is the vol move due to skew and item 2 is the atm vol move. Historically, in low vol regime (SPX making new highs), item 1 dominates item 2. The reason is simple, in a low vol regime there is not much room for the atm vol to be lower. The atm vol could still gradually decrease but incomparable to the skew. However, if spot is down a lot, then it enters the high vol regime, in which item 2 dominates.

However I should mention that it is not always the case that atm will increase when spot drops. There are mainly two scenarios where the opposite could happen. One is in an extremely high vol regime, say the implied vol is already 50, a not large enough drop of the spot could lead to a DECREASE of the vol. The other scenario is the so called "melt-up". In this case vol up when spot up, in other words vol down as spot down.


So firstly, only ITM puts have a low implied volatility relative to ITM calls. ITM puts and OTM calls must have the same IV due to Put-Call Parity. Negative IV skew exists in indices such as the S&P500, NASDAQ, etc where OTM puts and therefore ITM calls (Put-Call Parity) have a greatly higher IV relative to ATM IV and to the IV of OTM calls and ITM puts.

Although each product you look at will have a different shape of its respective implied volatility curve, so that must be taken into consideration when determinting residual PnL.

If you are long an ATM delta-hedged SPX call, your PnL will actually not just be dependent on whether the underlying realizes more volatility than the implied volatility you bought it at. In other words, your profits AND losses will not just be made up from the profits and losses from continuously delta-hedging (gamma profits outpacing losses from theta).

This is due to the existence of "skew delta" or "shadow delta". Under Black-Scholes, implied volatility should be constant across all strikes. But obviously that is not the case in the real-world due to existence of skew. If you go long an ATM call or put in general, and then delta-hedge to 0 right after, you are actually (most of the time) either long or short some extra deltas.

Why? Because if the market slides down, your fixed-strike call will have slid and moved to the right of the implied vol curve where it picks up an implied vol of the OTM calls, which even lower than ATM vol. You will lose the change in fixed strike vol * vega.

Now add in another factor. If there is an increase of X vol points to the entire floating vol curve of your tenor (aka your call option along with every other option on the chain gains 1 or 2 vol pts) the (vega) profits from that may have outpaced your fixed strike vol losses.

You will have residual PnL from being long/short extra deltas than you should when your Black-Scholes delta would tell you otherwise.

The spot and implied vol correlation, and whether or not the market is following the sticky delta or sticky strike dynamics, must be accounted for nowadays or you will be wondering about where you extra profit, or in most cases, losses came from due to residual Greeks e.g. shadow delta, shadow gamma and so on.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the reply. $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2022 at 10:45
  • $\begingroup$ Regarding your first point, thank you for clarifying, my question concerns movement from an ATM Call to ITM Call (OTM Put). I have edited it to reflect this. Further, I am more concerned with an ATM option that has been hedged with a Skew Delta, so in theory it shouldn't have residual delta/gamma as the underlier moves. My question is which effect dominates, the fixed strike losses or the chain's vol gains from the downside movement? From what I gather, the answer is 'it depends' ! $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2022 at 10:53
  • $\begingroup$ @fajitas_vol_trader No prob. If you are long an ATM Call, for it to pick up the vols of ITM Calls/OTM Puts, the market would have to move up. As the market moves up, those strikes slide lower e.g. to the left of the vol curve and pick up skew (look at the skew slope determine how much). If an ATM Option has had its Skew Delta hedged than yes in theory you should have little to none residual PnL. Whether fixed strike dominates or a parallel vol curve shift upwards, definitely depends. There are backbone models to get a good grasp of the spot/implied vol dynamics of XYZ stock. $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2022 at 19:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.