Neither of them is correct or incorrect, these are just two different numerical inputs that one should plug-in into two different formulas to get the market price of an option given all other information.
The Black-76 formula (i.e. Black-Scholes in terms of forward price rather than a spot price) for pricing a call option is
$$C_{BS}(K) = F_0 N(d_1) - K N(d_2)$$
where $d_{1,2} = \frac{\log(F_0/K)}{\sigma_{BS}\sqrt{T}}\pm\frac{\sigma_{BS}\sqrt{T}}{2}$.
The Bachelier formula for a call is
$$C_N(K) = (F_0-K) N(d_N) + \sigma_N\sqrt{T}n(d_N)$$
where $d_N = \frac{F_0-K}{\sigma_N\sqrt{T}}$.
It's clear that giving the same $K$, $F_0$, $T$ you have to use two different implied volatilites $\sigma_{BS}$ and $\sigma_N$ in order to match the market price of an option with two different formulas.
The more qualitative explanation is that volatility has different meanings in each model. The Black-Scholes model assumes a lognormal distribution of the underlying. The Bachelier model assumes a normal distribution. The Black-Scholes volatility $\sigma_{BS}$ measures the relative change in $F_t$, while the Bachelier volatility $\sigma_N$ measures the absolute change in $F_t$. In other words, the probability of the forward rate going from $1\%$ to $2\%$ is the same as the probability of it going from $2\%$ to $4\%$ in Black-Scholes and from $2\%$ to $3\%$ in Bachelier.
Thus these are just two different pricing conventions and one can more or less freely go back-and-forth between them. More details on conversion between Black-Scholes and Bachelier volatilities can be found in such articles as A Black-Scholes user's guide to the Bachelier model or Volatility conversion calculators if needed. Hope it helps.