I am not so sure about the ATM approximation from the other answer (i.e. I don't think it's a great approximation). I think it comes from the following for $T \ll 1$:
\begin{align}
E \left[ \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T \sigma^2_u \, du \right] &\approx
E \left[ \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T \left(\sigma_0 + d\sigma_0 \right)^2\, du \right] \\
&\approx \frac{1}{T}\int_0^T \sigma_0^2 \, du \\
&\approx I^2_{ATM}
\end{align}
since it can be shown rigorously that
$$\lim_{u \rightarrow 0} \sigma_u = I_{ATM}$$
You might be better off to use the rather famous expression for the variance swap strike due to Matytsin. It is (under the pricing measure):
$$
E \left[ \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T \sigma^2_u \, du \right] = \int_\mathbb{R} I^2(z) N'(z) dz
$$
where $z$ is the Black-Scholes `$d_2$' moneyness measure,
$$
d_2 := \frac{\log(S_t/K)}{I\sqrt T} - \frac{I\sqrt T}{2}
$$
and $N'(z)$ is the standard normal density.
What you can then do is expand the implied volatility in the integrand around $z=0$,
$$
I^2(z) = I^2(0) + z(I^2)'(0) + \frac{z^2}{2} (I^2)''(0) + \cdots
$$
and substitute this term back in the integral. The lowest order term is then
$$
E \left[ \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T \sigma^2_u \, du \right] \approx I^2(0)
$$
and I can already tell you that this is not a good enough approximation since $I(0)$ is approximately the volatility swap strike, so the lowest order approximation ignores the convexity correction. Hence you need to go to second order (you can ignore terms with $z^n$ where $n$ is odd):
$$
E \left[ \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T \sigma^2_u \, du \right] \approx I^2(0) + \frac{ (I^2)''(0)}{2} \int_{\mathbb R} z^2 N'(z) dz
$$
This is an OK approximation and can be used for non trivial $T$ values such as 1 week or 1 month and perhaps even larger $T$. Notice also that this approximation automatically gives you an expression for the convexity correction.