1
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to justify the lower bound for the price of a contingent claim (a European one) which is not marketable in an arbitrage free market. I would like to have your advice on my way to do it:

First, I start with the set $\{V_0(\theta) : V_T(\theta)\leq H\; and\;\theta\; admissible\}$ where $V_0(\theta)$ is the initial value of a portfolio with strategy $\theta$. I would like to show that $C_{-}:=\sup{\{V_0(\theta) : V_T(\theta)\leq H\; and\;\theta\; admissible\}}$ is a lower bound for the pricing of the contingent claim. Indeed, consider a price $V_0(\theta)<C_{-}$, then the buyer can short sell $C_{-}$, buy $V_0(\theta)$ and invest $(C_{-}-V_0(\theta))$ in a risk free asset such that at the maturity date $T$ the buyer can face the short selling by using $H$ and he receives $(C_{-}-V_0(\theta))(1+r)^T$ which is strictly positive.

However I am wondering if my arbitrage strategy is correct since why one will buy $C_{-}$ if there exists $V_0(\theta)<C_{-}$ ?

I think I have misunderstood something Thank you a lot

$\endgroup$

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.