0
$\begingroup$

Intuitively, if we hedge delta and rebalance that delta hedge periodically, we are effectively hedging a bit of gamma with each rebalance. I feel that this would depend on the rebalancing limits and the volatility of the underlying. So a delta hedging program does have some implied/effective gamma.

Alternatively, you can just hedge gamma directly.

I'd like to compare apples to oranges here. What's the cost of rebalancing vs the cost of just buying gamma. How would I calculate the effective curvature/gamma given a known volatility and rebalancing limits? Is this even a thing?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ "we are effectively hedging a bit of gamma with each rebalance" not sure I understood this part $\endgroup$
    – nbbo2
    Feb 16 at 17:35

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.