0
$\begingroup$

I wolud like to know if there is an analytic formula to to valuate a up-knock-in forward, it means \begin{equation*} (S_{H_B}-S_T)1_{[H_B\leq T]} \end{equation*} where $H_B=\inf[t\geq0 | S_t=B]$ for some barrier $B>0$. Is possible under the Black-Scholes model compute in analytic way this derivative?. I have been read the book of S. Shreve of stochastic calculus for finance II, but there is only formulas to knock-out options, if anyone knows where to read about theses subjets, or has some answer I really appreciate it. Thank you.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

We note that $\{H_B \le T \} = \{ \underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}S_t \ge B \}$ and $S_{H_B} = B$, then, it suffices to compute $$V:=\mathbb{E}((B-S_T)\cdot \mathbf{1}_{\{ \underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}S_t \ge B \}}) =B\cdot\mathbb{P}(\underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}S_t \ge B) -\mathbb{E}(S_T\cdot \mathbf{1}_{\{ \underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}S_t \ge B \}}) \tag{1}$$ Here, for the sake of simplicity, we ignore the discount factor in $(1)$ by supposing that $r=0$.

The dynamic of $S_t$ is described by $$\frac{dS_t}{S_t} = \sigma dW_t \iff S_t =S_0\cdot e^{\sigma W_t -\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2t}$$

Using the Proprosition10.4 in Chapter 10, Maximum of Brownian Motion, Privault, the first term of $(1)$ can be computed analytically, by denoting $\mu = -\frac{1}{2}\sigma$. Indeed, we have $$\mathbb{P}(\underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}S_t \ge B) = \mathbb{P}\left(\underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}(W_t-\frac{1}{2}\sigma t) \ge \frac{1}{2}\ln\left(\frac{B}{S_0}\right)\right)$$ and it suffices to apply the formula $(10.13)$

For the second term of $(1)$, we will use the Proprosition 10.3 for example, with $\tilde{W}_T := W_T +\mu T = W_T-\frac{1}{2}\sigma T $ we have: $$\begin{align} \mathbb{E}(S_T\cdot \mathbf{1}_{\{ \underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}S_t \ge B \}})=\mathbb{E}\left(S_0\cdot \exp\left(\sigma \tilde{W}_T \right)\cdot \mathbf{1}_{\left\{ \underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}\tilde{W}_t \ge \frac{1}{2}\ln\left(\frac{B}{S_0}\right) \right\}}\right) \tag{2} \end{align}$$ we apply the formula $(10.11)$ and compute numerically $(2)$ with a double integral.

Remark: I'm pretty sure that $(2)$ can be computed analytically with a more elegant method as follows:

  • First, make a change or measure by using the $S_t$-neutral measure, you can eliminate the term $S_T$ in $\mathbb{E}(S_T\cdot \mathbf{1}_{\{ \underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}S_t \ge B \}})$ $$\mathbb{E}(S_T\cdot \mathbf{1}_{\{ \underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}S_t \ge B \}}) = \mathbb{E}^{\mathbb{Q}_{S}}(\mathbf{1}_{\{ \underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}S_t \ge B \}}) = \mathbb{P}^{\mathbb{Q}_{S}}\left(\underset{0 \leq t \leq T}{\max}\bar{W}_t \ge \frac{1}{2}\ln\left(\frac{B}{S_0}\right) \right)$$
    where $\bar{W}_t: = W_t + \left(\alpha - \frac{1}{2}\sigma \right)t$. I let you find the right $\alpha $ in the new measure $\mathbb{Q}_S$ (I think $\alpha = 1$ but not sure)
  • Second, applying the Proprosition10.4 in Chapter 10, Maximum of Brownian Motion, Privault, and use the same technique for the first term of $(1)$, you deduce directly the closed-form formula of the second term of $(1)$
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! $\endgroup$
    – Don P.
    Sep 9, 2023 at 17:44
  • $\begingroup$ @DonP. you’re welcome! $\endgroup$
    – NN2
    Sep 9, 2023 at 18:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.