0
$\begingroup$

This is concerning a common interview style question which has me confused; it has been discussed here: How to Take Advantage of Arbitrage Opportunity of Two Options and Arbitrage opportunity interview question

The question reads "A European put option on a non-dividend paying stock with strike price 80 dollars is currently priced at 8 dollars and a put option on the same stock with strike price 90 dollars is priced at 9 dollars. Is there an arbitrage opportunity existing in these two options?"

The answers indicate that they know an arbitrage opportunity exists because they expect $Put(λK)<λPut(K)$, while in this case we have $Put(80) = (8/9)Put(90)$. However, I am not sure why we expect $Put(λK)<λPut(K)$. I believe the definition of convexity is that $Put(\lambda K_1 + (1-\lambda) K_2) \leq \lambda Put(K_1) + (1-\lambda) Put(K_2)$, and plugging in $K_2=0$ gives $Put(λK)\leq λPut(K)$. Since in the above problem we have $Put(80) = (8/9)Put(90)$, convexity is not violated, so what is indicating to us that there is an arbitrage opportunity?

$\endgroup$

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.