0
$\begingroup$

Let $M(h)$ be the moment-generating function, then the cumulant generating function is given by

$$K(h)=\text{ln}M(h)=\\ =\kappa_1h+\frac{1}{2!}h^2\kappa_2+\frac{1}{3!}h^3\kappa_3+\ldots$$ where $\kappa_1, \kappa_2, \ldots$, are the cumulants.

If $L=\sum_{j=1}^Nc_jx_j$ is a function of $N$ independent variables, then the cumulant-generating function for $L$ is given by $$ K(h)=\sum_{j=1}^NK_j(c_jh). $$

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ You should use the equation environment and latex. Do you know how to calculate the moment generating function $M(h)$ then the cumulant is just $\ln M(h)$ just look at the defintions (or e.g. wikipedia). $\endgroup$
    – Richi Wa
    Jan 9, 2014 at 11:45
  • $\begingroup$ Then for a normal distribution as in M(y)= E(e Aτ(t)) where A= e(βmean+(1/2) β^2*sigma^2) Thus I need to compute the Taylor expansion around the mean (τ (t)) $\endgroup$ Jan 9, 2014 at 11:58
  • $\begingroup$ Please yous latex, I can not read your formula. Whatever: you just take the log that's it! No expansion needed. If you know the moment generating function, then evaluate it and take the log. $\endgroup$
    – Richi Wa
    Jan 9, 2014 at 11:59
  • $\begingroup$ The issue is I did not find any function that allows the evaluation of the moment generating function so I can’ compute the ‘Cumulant moment generating function’ $\endgroup$ Jan 9, 2014 at 12:08
  • $\begingroup$ For the mgf you usually use the analytic expression if it is known. In the case of the normal distribution you write a function yourself (if it is not built in somewhwere in a package). But you really don't need the series expansion. $\endgroup$
    – Richi Wa
    Jan 9, 2014 at 13:05

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I am trying to make things clear with this answer. In the case of the normal distribution it holds that the moment generating function (mgf) is given by $$ M(h) = \exp(\mu h + \frac12 \sigma^2 h^2), $$ where $\mu$ is the mean and $\sigma^2$ is the variance. Thus the cumulant generating function $C(h)$ which is given by $C(h) = \ln (M(h))$ reduces to $$ C(h) = \mu h + \frac12 \sigma^2 h^2. $$ I am sure you can evaluate this in Matlab.

In the case of log-normal the mgf is not defined.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.