Skip to main content
added latex
Source Link
nbbo2
  • 11.8k
  • 3
  • 22
  • 36

In the literature I am reading "Deconstructing the yield curveCrump & Gospodinov Deconstructing the yield curve, FED REPORTS"Federal Reserve Bk of NY, Staff Report 884 (2019), I came across the definition for a one period holding return of a bond as:

The one-period holding return on a bond of maturity n$n$ from time t to t + 1 is defined as

  1. r(n)t,t+1 ≡ p(n−1)t+1 − p(n)t
    

$$ r^{(n)}_{t,t+1} \equiv p^{(n−1)}_{t+1} − p^{(n)}_{t} $$

I am unable to type superscript or subscript. But theThe idea is that the price is defined as

p(n)t = $p^{(n)}_t = $ the time t log price of a zero-coupon bond which pays $1 at time: (t+n) t + n.

givenGiven this, the one period return from time t to t+1 is

  1. r(n)t,t+1 ≡ p(n−1)t+1 − p(n)t

$ r^{(n)}_{t,t+1} = p^{(n−1)}_{t+1} − p^{(n)}_{t} $

r(n)t,t+1 ≡$ =$ price at time:(t+1+n-1) - price at time:(t+n)

r(n)t,t+1 ≡$ =$ price at time:(t+n) - price at time:(t+n)

r(n)t,t+1 ≡$=$ p(n)t − p(n)t

r(n)t,t+1 ≡$ = $ 0

I am wondering if I am missing something to understanding the return? because this would always result in 0.

In the literature I am reading "Deconstructing the yield curve, FED REPORTS", I came across the definition for a one period holding return of a bond as:

The one-period holding return on a bond of maturity n from time t to t + 1 is defined as

  1. r(n)t,t+1 ≡ p(n−1)t+1 − p(n)t
    

I am unable to type superscript or subscript. But the idea is that the price is defined as

p(n)t = price at time: (t+n)

given this, the one period return from time t to t+1 is

  1. r(n)t,t+1 ≡ p(n−1)t+1 − p(n)t

r(n)t,t+1 ≡ price at time:(t+1+n-1) - price at time:(t+n)

r(n)t,t+1 ≡ price at time:(t+n) - price at time:(t+n)

r(n)t,t+1 ≡ p(n)t − p(n)t

r(n)t,t+1 ≡ 0

I am wondering if I am missing something to understanding the return? because this would always result in 0.

In the literature I am reading Crump & Gospodinov Deconstructing the yield curve, Federal Reserve Bk of NY, Staff Report 884 (2019), I came across the definition for a one period holding return of a bond as:

The one-period holding return on a bond of maturity $n$ from time t to t + 1 is defined as

$$ r^{(n)}_{t,t+1} \equiv p^{(n−1)}_{t+1} − p^{(n)}_{t} $$

The idea is that the price is defined as $p^{(n)}_t = $ the time t log price of a zero-coupon bond which pays $1 at time t + n.

Given this, the one period return from time t to t+1 is

$ r^{(n)}_{t,t+1} = p^{(n−1)}_{t+1} − p^{(n)}_{t} $

$ =$ price at time:(t+1+n-1) - price at time:(t+n)

$ =$ price at time:(t+n) - price at time:(t+n)

$=$ p(n)t − p(n)t

$ = $ 0

I am wondering if I am missing something to understanding the return? because this would always result in 0.

Source Link
Omar
  • 13
  • 2

Bond one period holding return definition

In the literature I am reading "Deconstructing the yield curve, FED REPORTS", I came across the definition for a one period holding return of a bond as:

The one-period holding return on a bond of maturity n from time t to t + 1 is defined as

  1. r(n)t,t+1 ≡ p(n−1)t+1 − p(n)t
    

I am unable to type superscript or subscript. But the idea is that the price is defined as

p(n)t = price at time: (t+n)

given this, the one period return from time t to t+1 is

  1. r(n)t,t+1 ≡ p(n−1)t+1 − p(n)t

r(n)t,t+1 ≡ price at time:(t+1+n-1) - price at time:(t+n)

r(n)t,t+1 ≡ price at time:(t+n) - price at time:(t+n)

r(n)t,t+1 ≡ p(n)t − p(n)t

r(n)t,t+1 ≡ 0

I am wondering if I am missing something to understanding the return? because this would always result in 0.