In Bjork's arbitrage theory in continuous time, he writes

![enter image description here

S, essentially we define $Q$ using $h_t$, and then pick $h_t$ so $Q$ is a martingale measure.

But, $Q$ needs to be an equivalent measure. We know from Radon-Nikodym that when we define $Q$ using this method, $Q$ WILL be absolutely continuous with respect to $P$. That is, $Q << P$.

But that doesn't mean $P \sim Q.$ We also need $P <<Q$.

So why is the $Q$ as defined using $L_t$ and $h_t$ equivalent? The Radon-Nikodym theorem only gives tells us that it is absolutely continuous wrt $P$?


The process $L$ is strictly positive. This implies that $Q$ is equivalent to $P$ and not merely absolutely continuous.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.