This is something I've been thinking about for a while but I can't reach a clear conclusion. When we calculate, for example, the profit factor for a pairs trading strategy, do we treat each pairs trade as a single result or each of the separate trades on each instrument as a single result? For example, lets say we are trading 2 instruments A and B and we have the following results...

A: -2, 1, 3

B: 1,-2,1

Profit factor for each trade separably -> 5/4

Profit factor for each pair added together -> 4/2

If we treat each pairs trade as a single trade we get a better result, the same would apply when trying to calculate a Sharpe ratio. I guess one could ask the same question of hedged options trades, what do people generally do?


1 Answer 1


Of course you get through diversification effects different return variation and thus Sharpe ratios depending on whether you calculate the standard deviation on an individual asset or a portfolio standard deviation on a collection of assets. A pairs trade is a small portfolio so with favorable correlation properties you should generally get a better risk adjusted return on the pair than on each asset individually. Market practice is to treat a pair as a portfolio for risk attribution and performance attribution purposes. The whole point of the pairs trade was exactly that, the attempt at capturing a temporary deviation from a presumed co-integration pattern, correct?

  • $\begingroup$ I think so, I'd managed to roughly convince myself of the same, but it's good to see I'm thinking along the correct lines. $\endgroup$
    – Craig
    Commented Nov 22, 2012 at 17:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.