Skip to main content
English
Source Link
chrisaycock
  • 9.9k
  • 3
  • 39
  • 111

Symmetry of option implied-implied probability density

I was wounderingwondering whether the option implied probability density of the logreturnslog returns:

$x = \ln\left(\frac{S}{S_0}\right)$ with S the value of a certain stock, is always symmetric ?

I was asking myself this question because we model the "randomness" in the logreturnlog return with a Brownian motion which is symmetric around zero, which leads to a model of the form:

$dx_T = a(x,t)dt+b(x,t)dW_T$ with $W_T$ the Brownian motion. Where we simply have a drift where we superimpose a random walk.

In this kind of model there can't be a skewness, now I was wounderingwondering whether there were any models whichthat take skewness into account and if it's already been seen in the disstributiondistribution of the logreturns log returns?

Symmetry of option implied probability density

I was woundering whether the option implied probability density of the logreturns:

$x = \ln\left(\frac{S}{S_0}\right)$ with S the value of a certain stock, is always symmetric ?

I was asking myself this question because we model the "randomness" in the logreturn with a Brownian motion which is symmetric around zero, which leads to a model of the form:

$dx_T = a(x,t)dt+b(x,t)dW_T$ with $W_T$ the Brownian motion. Where we simply have a drift where we superimpose a random walk.

In this kind of model there can't be a skewness, now I was woundering whether there were any models which take skewness into account and if it's already been seen in the disstribution of the logreturns ?

Symmetry of option-implied probability density

I was wondering whether the option implied probability density of the log returns:

$x = \ln\left(\frac{S}{S_0}\right)$ with S the value of a certain stock, is always symmetric ?

I was asking myself this question because we model the "randomness" in the log return with a Brownian motion which is symmetric around zero, which leads to a model of the form:

$dx_T = a(x,t)dt+b(x,t)dW_T$ with $W_T$ the Brownian motion. Where we simply have a drift where we superimpose a random walk.

In this kind of model there can't be a skewness, now I was wondering whether there were any models that take skewness into account and if it's already been seen in the distribution of the log returns?

Clarified question
Source Link
Nick
  • 131
  • 7

I was woundering whether the option implied probability density of the logreturns:

$x = \ln\left(\frac{S}{S_0}\right)$ with S the value of a certain stock, is always symmetric ?

I was woundering about it and I believe it should beasking myself this question because in every model (that I've seen so far) we model the "randomness" in the logreturn with a Brownian motion which is symmetric around zero, which leads to a model of the form:

$dx_T = a(x,t)dt+b(x,t)dW_T$ with $W_T$ the Brownian motion. Where we simply have a drift where we superimpose a random walk. But that's just what I'm thinking, since I'm quite new to the subject I

In this kind of model there can't be sure.a skewness, now I was woundering whether there were any models which take skewness into account and if it's already been seen in the disstribution of the logreturns ?

I was woundering whether the option implied probability density of the logreturns:

$x = \ln\left(\frac{S}{S_0}\right)$ with S the value of a certain stock, is always symmetric ?

I was woundering about it and I believe it should be because in every model (that I've seen so far) we model the "randomness" with a Brownian motion which is symmetric around zero, which leads to a model of the form:

$dx_T = a(x,t)dt+b(x,t)dW_T$ with $W_T$ the Brownian motion. Where we simply have a drift where we superimpose a random walk. But that's just what I'm thinking, since I'm quite new to the subject I can't be sure.

I was woundering whether the option implied probability density of the logreturns:

$x = \ln\left(\frac{S}{S_0}\right)$ with S the value of a certain stock, is always symmetric ?

I was asking myself this question because we model the "randomness" in the logreturn with a Brownian motion which is symmetric around zero, which leads to a model of the form:

$dx_T = a(x,t)dt+b(x,t)dW_T$ with $W_T$ the Brownian motion. Where we simply have a drift where we superimpose a random walk.

In this kind of model there can't be a skewness, now I was woundering whether there were any models which take skewness into account and if it's already been seen in the disstribution of the logreturns ?

Source Link
Nick
  • 131
  • 7

Symmetry of option implied probability density

I was woundering whether the option implied probability density of the logreturns:

$x = \ln\left(\frac{S}{S_0}\right)$ with S the value of a certain stock, is always symmetric ?

I was woundering about it and I believe it should be because in every model (that I've seen so far) we model the "randomness" with a Brownian motion which is symmetric around zero, which leads to a model of the form:

$dx_T = a(x,t)dt+b(x,t)dW_T$ with $W_T$ the Brownian motion. Where we simply have a drift where we superimpose a random walk. But that's just what I'm thinking, since I'm quite new to the subject I can't be sure.