2
$\begingroup$

We have a financial derivative that pays $S_T \ln\left(S_T\right)$ at maturity $t=T$

We assume a Black-Scholes world:

  • No arbitrage opportunities.
  • No dividend payments from the stock $S_t$.
  • Existence of a riskless asset yielding the risk free rate
  • Possibility to borrow and lend infinitely at the risk-free rate.
  • Possibility to buy and sell infinitely the stock $-$ even fractional amounts.
  • No transaction costs.

We also assume that the stock is tradable and that the derivative is attainable $-$ we basically assume we are in the standard pricing setting.

What's the present value of this financial derivative at $t=0$ ?

My understanding is that using risk neutral measure to calculate PV of this payoff is rather difficult. We need to change the measure to simplify the calculation.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I assume this is a homework question. You do need to change the measure and price under $Q_s$ rather than $Q$.

$E_{Q}(S_T.\ln(S_T)) = S_t.E_{Q_s}(\ln(S_T))$

Note the SDEs for $dS_t$ and hence $d\ln(S_t)$ now change by virtue of the Girsanov theorem.

In particular $d\ln(S_t) = (r+\frac{\sigma^2}{2})dt + \sigma dW^{Q_s}_t$

Taking the integral then expectation, you should find eventually that

$PV(t) = S_t(\ln(St) + (r+\frac{\sigma^2}{2})(T-t))$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ "now change by virtue of the Girsanov theorem" how and why? $\endgroup$
    – Trajan
    Commented Jul 3, 2020 at 17:16
  • $\begingroup$ “The SDEs ... now change” (“now that the measure is changed”). If you change the measure, the SDE $dS_t$ (and any other that depends on it) changes under the new measure. This is the Girsanov theorem. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girsanov_theorem for example. $\endgroup$
    – Ivan
    Commented Jul 4, 2020 at 18:54
  • $\begingroup$ how did you know it would be that form though? $\endgroup$
    – Trajan
    Commented Jul 5, 2020 at 6:16
  • $\begingroup$ If you change the measure from $Q$ to $Q_s$ and apply the Girsanov theorem, you get that form for $dln(S_t)$. It is different from that under $Q$. In the first place you use Ito to get $dln(S_t)$. $\endgroup$
    – Ivan
    Commented Jul 5, 2020 at 10:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.