1
$\begingroup$

So I am writing my bachelor thesis about the naive portfolio vs mean-variance portfolio and I am currently a bit stuck at the part about describing the mean-variance portfolio. I know that if there are only constraints in the form of equalities, you can use the Lagrangian method in order to find a closed form solution for the problem: $$ min\frac{\lambda}{2}w\Sigma w^T-w^T\mu $$ But in my problem I have the following constraints: $e^Tw=1$ and $0\leq w_i\leq1$, with e being the vectors of ones. Can I only find a optimal weight allocation by using quadratic programming?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Because of the no short selling constraint the answer is unfortunately yes, there is no analytic solution for this case. It requires applying an optimization algorithm. $\endgroup$
    – nbbo2
    Commented Oct 29, 2023 at 12:24

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

There is a closed-form solution for this in DeMiguel, Plyakha, Uppal, Vilkov (2013) in equation (8). You can take a look at it yourself in the paper as well. However, this is only for the minimum-variance portfolio, I am not sure if there is one for the mean-variance. For this minimum-variance case,

\begin{equation} w_{min} = \frac{\Sigma^{-1} e}{e^T \Sigma^{-1} e} \end{equation}

with $e=[1, 1, \cdots, 1]$. The only difference being that you can short securities, so you no longer have the purely positive weights constraints. However, I am more of a fan of the quadratic programming approach. Hopefully this gives you some ideas?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! I was indeed already moving towards quadratic programming but I thought maybe a closed form solution would be easier. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 30, 2023 at 13:04
  • $\begingroup$ @soulsbornefan you can give me an upvote if you feel my answer helped :) $\endgroup$
    – KaiSqDist
    Commented Oct 30, 2023 at 13:46
  • $\begingroup$ @Kai I think he was asking explicitly for a solution with shortsale constraints..I was thinking about something similar to Kuhn-Tucker, however, this leaves the question unsanswered as one has to specify the Lagrange multipliers .. $\endgroup$
    – T123
    Commented Nov 30, 2023 at 12:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.