So I am writing my bachelor thesis about the naive portfolio vs mean-variance portfolio and I am currently a bit stuck at the part about describing the mean-variance portfolio. I know that if there are only constraints in the form of equalities, you can use the Lagrangian method in order to find a closed form solution for the problem: $$ min\frac{\lambda}{2}w\Sigma w^T-w^T\mu $$ But in my problem I have the following constraints: $e^Tw=1$ and $0\leq w_i\leq1$, with e being the vectors of ones. Can I only find a optimal weight allocation by using quadratic programming?
1 Answer
There is a closed-form solution for this in DeMiguel, Plyakha, Uppal, Vilkov (2013) in equation (8). You can take a look at it yourself in the paper as well. However, this is only for the minimum-variance portfolio, I am not sure if there is one for the mean-variance. For this minimum-variance case,
\begin{equation} w_{min} = \frac{\Sigma^{-1} e}{e^T \Sigma^{-1} e} \end{equation}
with $e=[1, 1, \cdots, 1]$. The only difference being that you can short securities, so you no longer have the purely positive weights constraints. However, I am more of a fan of the quadratic programming approach. Hopefully this gives you some ideas?
-
$\begingroup$ Thank you very much! I was indeed already moving towards quadratic programming but I thought maybe a closed form solution would be easier. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 30, 2023 at 13:04
-
$\begingroup$ @soulsbornefan you can give me an upvote if you feel my answer helped :) $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 30, 2023 at 13:46
-
$\begingroup$ @Kai I think he was asking explicitly for a solution with shortsale constraints..I was thinking about something similar to Kuhn-Tucker, however, this leaves the question unsanswered as one has to specify the Lagrange multipliers .. $\endgroup$– T123Commented Nov 30, 2023 at 12:45