3
$\begingroup$

I am a research intern and I am working on a topic about a profit maximization of a risk-averse newsvendor by using Conditional Value-at-Risk.The problem is that I found different expressions of CVaR. In a risk-averse newsboy problem papers, I have found the following formula :

enter image description here

But, in risk management papers (finance etc), I have found the following one with its proof : enter image description here

The first formula is a maximization problem and the second one, it is a minimizarion.

The problem is that I coudn'd find the link between the two formulas.

π(μ,D) : π is a profit function which depends on some factors that we can control μ (decision variables vector) and D represents randomness and this case it is random demand. Y : is a random variable that represents loss function. α is variable. It does not have a special signification. But we can prove that Value-at-Risk is a solution of the second optimization problem. I thing there is something missing but I dont know what because first we talk about profit and then we talk aboout loss. Maybe there is something missing related to this.

Could you please help me?

Thanks

$\endgroup$
6
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I would suggest you edit the question by adding more context and definitions for all notations. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    Commented May 29, 2019 at 13:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Keep in mind that maximization of $x$ is equivalent to minimization of $-x$. So it is important to understand what $a$ and $\nu$ represent. For example are we trying to maximize a gain or minimize a loss. And do we lose when $\{\cdots\}$ is too high or do we lose when it is too low. $\endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Commented May 29, 2019 at 14:27
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the edit, but still not clear. Please provide definitions to all notations. For example, what is $\mu$, what is $D$, and what is $\pi(\mu, D)$? Similarly, what are $Y$ and $\alpha$? $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    Commented May 29, 2019 at 14:53
  • $\begingroup$ π(μ,D) : π is a profit function which depends on some factors that we can control μ (decision variables vector) and D represents randomness and this case it is random demand. Y : is a random variable that represents loss function. α is variable. It does not have a special signification. But we can prove that Value-at-Risk is a solution of the second optimization problem. I thing there is something missing but I dont know what because first we talk about profit and then we talk aboout loss. Maybe there is something missing related to this. I hope it's clearer this time. Thanks $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2019 at 19:08
  • $\begingroup$ $Y$ and $\pi(\mu, D)$ must have some relationships to make the comparison meaningful- you can not just comparing two random variables. Please edit directly in your question. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    Commented May 29, 2019 at 19:17

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

If $Y=-\pi(\mu,D)$ then the first formula is $$\mathrm{CVaR}_\eta(-Y)=\max_{\nu\in R}\left\{\nu+\frac1\eta E((-Y-\nu)^-)\right\}$$ where $X^-=\min (X,0)$ and $X^+=\max(X,0)$. Note that $(-X)^-=-(X^+)$.

If we let $1-\alpha=\eta$ and $\nu=-a$ this becomes (assuming $\max=\sup$, i.e. the sup is attained, and using $\sup(\mathcal A)=-\inf(-\mathcal A)$): $$\begin{eqnarray*}\max_{\nu\in R}\left\{\nu+\frac{1}{1-\alpha} E(-((Y+\nu)^+))\right\}&=&\sup_{\nu\in R}\left\{\nu+\frac{-1}{1-\alpha} E((Y+\nu)^+)\right\}\\ =\sup_{a\in R}\left\{-a+\frac{-1}{1-\alpha} E((Y-a)^+)\right\} &=&-\inf_{a\in R}\left\{-\left(-a+\frac{-1}{1-\alpha} E((Y-a)^+)\right)\right\}\\ &=&-\inf_{a\in R}\left\{a+\frac{1}{1-\alpha} E((Y-a)^+)\right\}\end{eqnarray*}$$

Now let's imagine $\pi(\mu,D)$ is profit and $Y=-\pi(\mu,D)$ is a corresponding loss.

So the CVaR of $Y$, the loss, according to the second formula, is the negative of the CVaR of the profit, $-Y$, according to the first formula.

So I guess when dealing with a loss we take the CVaR to be negative, see e.g. an answer by Kozarevic.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. What you did sound correct but personaly, I stil missing something. In the case of a profit function, let call it Y, CVaR is the expected profit if Y exceeds or doesnt exceed VaR(Y). If Y is a loss function, CVaR is the expected loss if Y exceeds or doesnt exceed VaR. I hope my question is clear. Thanks I am really confused between loss and profit functions and how VaR and CVaR expressions vary with respect to if Y is a loss or a profit function. $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2019 at 20:52
  • $\begingroup$ @MohamedChaaban OK I added something, maybe it helps $\endgroup$ Commented May 30, 2019 at 0:31
  • $\begingroup$ @kjos-hanssen thanks a lot man. $\endgroup$ Commented May 30, 2019 at 2:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.