The question title says it all: We know that in general, specifying the short rate $r(t)$ does not specify the bond prices $P(t, T)$. So how can a model for short rates—for example the Vasicek model—be powerful enough to price interest rate derivatives?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ They DO NOT determine bond prices under the objective measure, but they DO under the risk neutral one. $\endgroup$
    – ab94
    Commented Sep 7, 2019 at 14:04

1 Answer 1


Let $r(s)$ be the process of a short rate. Then, by risk neutral pricing, $$ P(t,T) = \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}\left[ \exp\left( -\int_t^T r(s)\mathrm{d}s\right) \Bigg| \mathcal{F}_t\right].$$ Thus, the zero-coupon bond is determined completely by the short rate process. Here, $P(t,T)$ denotes the time $t$ price of a zero-coupon bond maturing at time $T$. You just take the risk-neutral expectation of the discounted payoff. The payoff is $1$ for almost all states of the world $\omega\in\Omega$ (assuming no default risk). Thus, the price of the bond is the conditional expectation of the discount factor. The risk-neutral measure $\mathbb{Q}$ uses a bank account $(B_t)$ as numeraire with $\mathrm{d}B_t=r(t)B_t\mathrm{d}t$.

Short rate models (such as Vasicek, Hull-White, CIR, etc.) specify a stochastic model for $r(s)$, typically a (perhaps multidimensional) SDE and then, you can find (sometimes analytical) prices for bonds, bond options, swaptions etc.

The easiest case is a deterministic and constant short rate $r(s)\equiv r$. Then, $$P(t,T)=e^{-r(T-t)}$$ and clearly the short rate $r$ gives you the bond price.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.